H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs John Alexander H2H: 0-2
John Alexander holds a 2–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Alexander leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Alexander won the 1982 La Quinta second round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 75
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1982* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | John Alexander | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1981* | Tampa | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John Alexander | 7-6 6-1 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| John Alexander | #860 | #8 | 0 | 2,067 | 579 | 422 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | John Alexander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 44–36 | 55.0% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 36–32 | 52.9% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #26 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 67–24 | 73.6% | #8 | 1,957 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #47 | 1,851 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 48–33 | 59.3% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 50–31 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #20 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #100 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #75 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #31 | 1,791 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #77 | 1,656 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #142 | 1,564 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,491 | 0 | 9 |