H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 0-2

Tim Wilkison holds a 2–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Wilkison leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1989 Charleston round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Tim Wilkison
USA Age 66 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Wilkison #125 6-4 6-4 Jimmy Arias #113 Match data May 12, 1989* R16 Charleston ATP 250 Clay
Tim Wilkison #82 6-3 6-1 Jimmy Arias Match data Feb 5, 1981* R32 Richmond Wct ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Tim Wilkison #1,167 #23 269 1,897 294 298 49.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Arias Tim Wilkison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 1977 21–27 43.8% #93 1,567 0 0
18 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5 1978 10–13 43.5% #54 1,659 0 1
19 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 1979 26–26 50.0% #69 1,666 0 2
20 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 1980 24–25 49.0% #95 1,685 0 2
21 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1981 23–24 48.9% #71 1,756 0 3
22 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1982 28–22 56.0% #61 1,715 0 4
23 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5 1983 14–20 41.2% #88 1,683 0 4
24 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5 1984 26–20 56.5% #39 1,767 0 5
25 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5 1985 36–28 56.2% #44 1,807 0 6
26 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5 1986 33–23 58.9% #29 1,772 0 6
27 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5 1987 23–20 53.5% #55 1,731 0 6
28 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5 1988 15–20 42.9% #121 1,673 0 6
29 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5 1989 8–16 33.3% #124 1,601 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1990 7–13 35.0% #210 1,542 0 6
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,524 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Arias Tim Wilkison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1977 7 9 16 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1978 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 6 8 14 42.9%
20 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1980 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7%
21 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
23 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 1983 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 15 8 23 65.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 23 11 34 67.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 14 11 25 56.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1988 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% — 143 126 269 53.2% 34 39 73 46.6% 73 61 134 54.5% 44 72 116 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Arias Tim Wilkison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.99 1977 1567 122.3 — — — — -3 +28 -30 44.0% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +4.04
18 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.41 1978 1660 119.2 — — — — -158 — +58 42.4% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.15
19 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32 1979 1666 141.3 — — — — +26 -130 +55 50.4% +0.12 5–5 (50%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.77
20 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) — +1.26 1980 1685 133.1 — — — — +47 -139 -15 46.2% -0.09 8–4 (67%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.50
21 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.60 1981 1756 139.5 — — — — -103 — +46 50.4% -0.15 7–8 (47%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.41
22 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.03 1982 1716 131.5 — — — — +37 -178 +17 52.5% +0.20 12–3 (80%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.66
23 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.94 1983 1683 139.3 — — — — +39 — -5 42.2% -0.40 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.94
24 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.89 1984 1767 141.4 — — — — -9 -95 -134 54.5% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 5–11 (31%) — +1.11
25 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.09 1985 1807 144.0 — — — — -6 -169 -99 56.4% +0.46 9–13 (41%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.48
26 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.40 1986 1773 145.5 — — — — +8 -113 -1 55.6% +0.64 10–5 (67%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.92
27 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26 1987 1731 138.2 — — — — 0 — +53 50.9% +0.10 12–7 (63%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.49
28 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34 1988 1673 129.9 — — — — +18 — +13 44.2% -0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.05
29 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36 1989 1602 130.6 — — — — -14 +67 +72 33.9% -0.84 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.68
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1542 110.3 — — — — -17 +146 +113 34.0% -0.92 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.59
33 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03 1993 1525 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.17
Career — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 — 1897 141.4 — — — — -1 -64 +12 48.8% +0.03 94–75 (56%) 97–101 (49%) 104.5 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.