H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jimmy Wang vs Kevin Kim H2H: 2-0
Jimmy Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Kevin Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Wang won the 2006 Tokyo second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2006* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jimmy Wang | 6-3 6-1 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2005* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jimmy Wang | 6-3 7-6(8) | Kevin Kim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Wang | #1,017 | #85 | 487 | 1,731 | 22 | 41 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Wang | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #148 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #148 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |