H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jiri Novak vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 4-1

Jiri Novak holds a 4–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jiri Novak leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2002 Australian Open third round 6-3 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jiri Novak
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jiri Novak #24 6-3 6-4 6-1 Francisco Clavet #61 Match data
Jul 14, 2000* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Jiri Novak #44 6-3 7-5 Francisco Clavet #46 Match data
Nov 3, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Francisco Clavet #32 6-4 6-1 Jiri Novak #37 Match data
Jul 23, 1999* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Clay Jiri Novak #59 2-6 6-3 6-2 Francisco Clavet #23 Match data
Jan 20, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jiri Novak #73 6-3 6-4 6-3 Francisco Clavet #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jiri Novak #930 #5 2,355 1,940 318 250 56.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jiri Novak Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 1–1 50.0% #286 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #205 1,515 0 0 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 1995 5–9 35.7% #53 1,541 0 0 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0
21 1996 30–23 56.6% #52 1,696 0 1 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 1997 20–19 51.3% #48 1,692 0 1 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1
23 1998 20–21 48.8% #75 1,709 0 2 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1
24 1999 28–26 51.9% #40 1,762 0 2 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1
25 2000 24–25 49.0% #53 1,696 0 2 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1
26 2001 28–17 62.2% #29 1,859 0 4 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2
27 2002 50–27 64.9% #7 1,899 0 4 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3
28 2003 41–25 62.1% #13 1,827 0 5 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5
29 2004 37–20 64.9% #24 1,918 0 7 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 2005 22–23 48.9% #48 1,661 0 7 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 2006 12–13 48.0% #129 1,711 0 7 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8