Jiri Novak
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 4 | 6 | 10 | Nov 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Felix Mantilla | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 27, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Jiri Novak holds a 4–1 lead over Marcelo Rios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jiri Novak leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Novak won the 2002 US Open round of 32 6-3 6-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | 6-3 6-3 (ret.) | Marcelo Rios | Match data | Sep 1, 2002* | R32 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Jiri Novak | 6-2 6-2 | Marcelo Rios | Match data | Jul 24, 1999* | QF | Stuttgart Open | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Clay |
| Jiri Novak | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | Marcelo Rios | Match data | Jul 11, 1996* | R32 | Swiss Open Gstaad | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Marcelo Rios | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Jiri Novak | Match data | Apr 25, 1996* | R32 | Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Jiri Novak | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Marcelo Rios | Match data | Nov 2, 1995* | R32 | Montevideo | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | #930 | #5 | 2,355 | 1,940 | 319 | 253 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,129 | 366 | 180 | 67.0% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 18 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Marcelo Rios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #53 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1996 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #52 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1997 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,963 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #75 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,918 | 0 | 15 |
| 24 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,768 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 16 |
| 25 | 2000 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,839 | 0 | 18 |
| 26 | 2001 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #29 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 2002 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #7 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,822 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 2003 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #129 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Marcelo Rios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% |
| 20 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1996 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 28 | 10 | 38 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 21 | 1996 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1997 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 23 | 9 | 32 | 71.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 22 | 1997 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1998 | 33 | 9 | 42 | 78.6% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% |
| 23 | 1998 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1999 | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1999 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2000 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2000 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2001 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2002 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2002 | 33 | 15 | 48 | 68.8% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2003 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 153 | 116 | 269 | 56.9% | 119 | 90 | 209 | 56.9% | 17 | 18 | 35 | 48.6% | 30 | 29 | 59 | 50.8% | — | 172 | 84 | 256 | 67.2% | 164 | 74 | 238 | 68.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 26 | 16 | 42 | 61.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 503/572 of Jiri Novak's and 466/546 of Marcelo Rios's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Marcelo Rios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 63.3% | 58.9% | 36.4% | 48.5% | 20.6% | 50.4% | 39.6% | 1994 | 20/23 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 60.5% | 65.5% | 52.6% | 49.4% | 48.5% | 60.1% | 41.2% |
| 19 | 1994 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 55.1% | 60.5% | 40.0% | 22.2% | 28.6% | 51.3% | 37.5% | 1995 | 55/58 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 62.5% | 69.4% | 55.4% | 59.3% | 44.6% | 64.1% | 40.7% |
| 20 | 1995 | 13/14 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 66.4% | 61.6% | 45.2% | 55.0% | 41.9% | 56.6% | 42.7% | 1996 | 69/77 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 52.3% | 73.2% | 53.0% | 54.8% | 48.7% | 63.5% | 40.2% |
| 21 | 1996 | 51/54 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 65.5% | 66.4% | 48.9% | 56.3% | 52.3% | 60.2% | 40.7% | 1997 | 62/80 | 5.2 | 3.1 | 54.3% | 71.9% | 53.9% | 58.8% | 43.0% | 63.7% | 40.0% |
| 22 | 1997 | 35/39 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 67.9% | 70.2% | 49.2% | 60.7% | 44.1% | 63.0% | 39.6% | 1998 | 69/84 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 59.2% | 76.8% | 57.1% | 63.8% | 47.6% | 68.7% | 44.8% |
| 23 | 1998 | 34/41 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 64.0% | 67.7% | 53.0% | 54.3% | 40.5% | 61.9% | 41.5% | 1999 | 51/61 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 55.5% | 70.9% | 53.9% | 56.5% | 43.7% | 63.2% | 42.0% |
| 24 | 1999 | 41/54 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 62.7% | 68.1% | 51.5% | 60.6% | 46.1% | 62.0% | 41.0% | 2000 | 43/48 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 55.1% | 72.7% | 53.6% | 62.1% | 42.8% | 64.1% | 39.2% |
| 25 | 2000 | 38/50 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 65.1% | 68.5% | 50.2% | 57.4% | 36.4% | 62.1% | 39.0% | 2001 | 39/47 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 58.4% | 72.0% | 51.3% | 60.6% | 48.9% | 63.3% | 40.2% |
| 26 | 2001 | 37/45 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 64.2% | 71.3% | 53.1% | 54.8% | 46.2% | 64.9% | 41.6% | 2002 | 41/50 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 60.8% | 70.2% | 51.2% | 59.0% | 50.6% | 62.7% | 38.1% |
| 27 | 2002 | 64/77 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 65.9% | 70.8% | 53.7% | 59.4% | 45.4% | 64.9% | 42.4% | 2003 | 17/18 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 65.0% | 73.6% | 52.4% | 56.3% | 39.8% | 66.5% | 44.1% |
| 28 | 2003 | 63/66 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 65.5% | 70.8% | 52.2% | 57.9% | 45.1% | 64.2% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 56/59 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 64.5% | 71.6% | 50.9% | 59.8% | 46.1% | 63.9% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 43/45 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 65.3% | 66.8% | 49.9% | 60.4% | 40.3% | 61.0% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 25/25 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 64.8% | 69.2% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 36.5% | 62.2% | 37.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 503/572 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 65.1% | 69.1% | 51.0% | 57.9% | 44.0% | 62.7% | 40.6% | — | 466/546 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 57.5% | 72.1% | 53.8% | 58.7% | 46.1% | 64.3% | 41.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jiri Novak | Marcelo Rios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1517 | 109.9 | +2.28 | +0.87 | 0.799 | 44.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -2.20 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | -0.14 | 1994 | 1616 | 137.6 | +0.45 | +1.49 | 1.032 | 50.6% | -52 | +21 | — | 55.0% | +0.22 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.0 | -0.43 |
| 19 | 1994 | 1515 | 112.8 | +4.42 | +2.29 | 0.770 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.30 | 1995 | 1771 | 143.6 | +2.61 | +2.16 | 1.134 | 52.1% | -64 | +64 | -204 | 62.1% | +0.70 | 11–6 (65%) | 15–7 (68%) | 108.6 | +0.33 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1541 | 124.9 | -1.61 | +1.61 | 0.985 | 49.3% | -3 | +37 | — | 34.4% | -0.44 | 2–0 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.13 | 1996 | 1838 | 152.6 | +2.05 | +2.33 | 1.101 | 51.6% | -34 | +60 | — | 61.9% | +0.60 | 14–6 (70%) | 18–8 (69%) | 109.0 | +2.50 |
| 21 | 1996 | 1693 | 141.1 | -1.19 | +2.05 | 1.024 | 50.5% | -5 | -39 | — | 52.9% | +0.16 | 13–9 (59%) | 10–8 (56%) | 107.2 | +0.91 | 1997 | 1870 | 152.1 | +2.50 | +1.54 | 1.103 | 51.7% | +18 | +34 | -203 | 62.1% | +0.79 | 18–8 (69%) | 16–20 (44%) | 100.2 | +2.15 |
| 22 | 1997 | 1693 | 141.4 | +0.90 | +1.84 | 1.072 | 51.2% | +32 | -54 | — | 51.0% | +0.38 | 7–7 (50%) | 5–11 (31%) | 94.5 | +0.10 | 1998 | 1963 | 161.2 | +5.86 | +6.49 | 1.429 | 55.9% | +47 | +47 | — | 74.9% | +1.61 | 6–7 (46%) | 13–6 (68%) | 97.5 | +0.31 |
| 23 | 1998 | 1710 | 138.8 | -0.13 | +2.19 | 1.090 | 51.3% | -48 | +49 | — | 47.2% | +0.06 | 11–9 (55%) | 6–15 (29%) | 97.0 | -0.98 | 1999 | 1918 | 149.7 | +1.16 | +3.33 | 1.141 | 52.4% | +10 | +119 | — | 68.0% | +0.95 | 13–3 (81%) | 15–9 (63%) | 104.6 | +0.91 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1769 | 144.0 | +0.38 | +2.95 | 1.078 | 51.4% | -34 | +17 | -167 | 49.3% | +0.21 | 13–7 (65%) | 9–18 (33%) | 100.1 | -1.88 | 2000 | 1797 | 147.3 | +2.03 | +1.16 | 1.090 | 51.4% | +20 | +166 | — | 61.5% | +0.77 | 7–9 (44%) | 15–10 (60%) | 97.2 | -0.74 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1698 | 135.5 | +0.88 | +1.43 | 1.030 | 50.2% | -24 | +91 | — | 46.3% | -0.30 | 9–6 (60%) | 9–7 (56%) | 106.4 | -0.98 | 2001 | 1839 | 143.7 | +1.20 | +2.08 | 1.095 | 51.6% | +26 | -19 | — | 57.9% | +0.52 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–4 (60%) | 100.3 | -0.04 |
| 26 | 2001 | 1861 | 155.0 | +2.25 | +3.70 | 1.185 | 52.9% | -87 | +108 | — | 59.1% | +0.73 | 8–5 (62%) | 8–9 (47%) | 103.0 | -2.12 | 2002 | 1820 | 149.1 | +0.99 | +1.31 | 1.023 | 50.6% | +48 | -37 | — | 63.5% | +0.74 | 7–5 (58%) | 14–10 (58%) | 101.6 | +0.28 |
| 27 | 2002 | 1907 | 151.6 | +2.81 | +4.54 | 1.206 | 53.4% | -4 | +6 | -360 | 61.1% | +0.94 | 12–6 (67%) | 7–11 (39%) | 98.8 | +1.43 | 2003 | 1823 | 138.3 | +2.95 | +4.36 | 1.313 | 55.0% | +78 | -41 | — | 69.7% | +1.21 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–0 (100%) | 103.5 | +0.79 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1830 | 140.9 | +1.53 | +2.70 | 1.131 | 52.0% | 0 | +90 | -190 | 58.4% | +0.62 | 13–9 (59%) | 10–12 (45%) | 97.4 | +1.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 1908 | 146.7 | +1.37 | +3.15 | 1.115 | 52.0% | +30 | -71 | -246 | 59.0% | +0.75 | 11–3 (79%) | 7–5 (58%) | 107.8 | -0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 1677 | 131.0 | -1.54 | +1.71 | 1.018 | 50.2% | +80 | +90 | +18 | 50.9% | +0.14 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–7 (50%) | 95.1 | +2.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 1717 | 130.7 | +0.78 | -0.28 | 0.984 | 49.7% | +72 | -5 | -79 | 47.5% | -0.21 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–5 (55%) | 99.7 | -1.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1940 | 148.5 | +0.78 | +2.55 | 1.087 | 51.4% | -1 | +31 | -173 | 53.4% | +0.35 | 108–73 (60%) | 88–111 (44%) | 101.4 | -0.15 | — | 2130 | 155.6 | +2.44 | +2.75 | 1.148 | 52.4% | +15 | +57 | -203 | 64.3% | +0.85 | 88–58 (60%) | 121–76 (61%) | 107.0 | +1.12 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 4 | 6 | 10 | Nov 4, 2004 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jun 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Felix Mantilla | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 27, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 23, 2002 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 3 | 7 | 10 | Jan 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Alberto Berasategui | 6 | 4 | 10 | Jun 2, 1999 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 2 | 6 | 8 | Mar 21, 2002 | H2H |
| Andrei Pavel | 7 | 1 | 8 | Jan 11, 2002 | H2H |