H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Jiri Novak vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 3-2

Jiri Novak holds a 3–2 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–1 on clay, while Jiri Novak leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2001 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-3 6-7(5) 2-6 8-6.

CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 3, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Thomas Enqvist #14 6-2 6-3 6-7(5) 2-6 8-6 Jiri Novak #55 Match data
May 4, 2001* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Jiri Novak #68 1-6 6-2 7-6(2) Thomas Enqvist #14 Match data
Aug 5, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jiri Novak #55 6-2 1-6 3-1 (ret.) Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data
May 6, 2000* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Enqvist #9 6-3 6-4 Jiri Novak #42 Match data
Aug 11, 1997 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Jiri Novak #58 7-5 3-6 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jiri Novak #930 #5 2,355 1,940 318 250 56.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jiri Novak Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1993 1–1 50.0% #286 1,517 0 0 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1994 0–1 0.0% #205 1,515 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1995 5–9 35.7% #53 1,541 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 1996 30–23 56.6% #52 1,696 0 1 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 1997 20–19 51.3% #48 1,692 0 1 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 1998 20–21 48.8% #75 1,709 0 2 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 1999 28–26 51.9% #40 1,762 0 2 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 2000 24–25 49.0% #53 1,696 0 2 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2001 28–17 62.2% #29 1,859 0 4 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2002 50–27 64.9% #7 1,899 0 4 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2003 41–25 62.1% #13 1,827 0 5 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2004 37–20 64.9% #24 1,918 0 7 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2005 22–23 48.9% #48 1,661 0 7 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2006 12–13 48.0% #129 1,711 0 7 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19