H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Vanek vs Danai Udomchoke H2H: 1-0
Jiri Vanek holds a 1–0 lead over Danai Udomchoke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Vanek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Vanek won the 2004 Bangkok third round 3-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
THA
Age 44
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jiri Vanek | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Danai Udomchoke | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Danai Udomchoke | 6-2 6-7(2) 10-8 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danai Udomchoke | #1,207 | #77 | 646 | 1,631 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vanek | Danai Udomchoke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #283 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #210 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |