H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Jiri Vanek vs Jesse Huta Galung H2H: 1-0
Jiri Vanek holds a 1–0 lead over Jesse Huta Galung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Vanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jiri Vanek won the 2008 Roland Garros first round 6-3 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 40
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jiri Vanek | 6-3 7-5 6-2 | Jesse Huta Galung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jesse Huta Galung | #1,606 | #91 | 609 | 1,630 | 5 | 25 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vanek | Jesse Huta Galung | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #209 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #101 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #195 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #436 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |