H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Jiri Vanek vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0
Jiri Vanek holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Vanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jiri Vanek won the 2000 Atlanta third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2000* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jiri Vanek | 7-5 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vanek | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |