H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Vanek vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 0-1
Markus Hipfl holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 2001 St. Poelten fourth round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2004 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Jiri Vanek | 6-4 6-2 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
| May 25, 2001* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Markus Hipfl | 7-5 6-0 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vanek | Markus Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |