H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jiri Vanek vs Todd Larkham

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jiri Vanek vs Todd Larkham.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jiri Vanek
CZE Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Todd Larkham
AUS Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Larkham #202 4-6 7-5 6-1 Jiri Vanek #161 Match data May 26, 2003 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jiri Vanek #1,543 #74 796 1,646 68 122 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Todd Larkham #1,466 #136 274 1,607 3 14 17.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jiri Vanek Todd Larkham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 1–1 50.0% #495 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — 1996 0–2 0.0% #265 1,478 0 0
22 2000 12–13 48.0% #77 1,591 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #189 1,493 0 0
23 2001 11–22 33.3% #102 1,534 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% #247 1,485 0 0
24 2002 2–4 33.3% #199 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2003 7–9 43.8% #143 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2004 4–7 36.4% #115 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2005 7–18 28.0% #99 1,500 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #233 1,464 0 0
28 2006 10–17 37.0% #102 1,552 0 0 2003 1–4 20.0% #167 1,565 0 0
29 2007 7–13 35.0% #101 1,578 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #1001 1,562 0 0
30 2008 7–16 30.4% #124 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2009 0–2 0.0% #175 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jiri Vanek Todd Larkham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2001 3 9 12 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1 6 7 14.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 42 60 30.0% 48 66 114 42.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% — 1 9 10 10.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 180/190 of Jiri Vanek's and 14/17 of Todd Larkham's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jiri Vanek Todd Larkham
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1995 2/2 2.5 2.0 43.3% 49.4% 41.6% 39.2% 61.4% 44.6% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/2 0.0 2.0 65.9% 46.4% 44.8% 66.7% 37.5% 45.9% 39.0%
22 2000 22/25 6.0 3.5 55.1% 69.7% 47.3% 55.9% 43.2% 59.7% 36.5% 1997 4/5 1.8 7.0 58.8% 62.1% 38.2% 51.0% 41.7% 52.2% 27.4%
23 2001 29/33 5.4 2.2 54.5% 69.6% 45.8% 54.7% 42.3% 58.4% 36.3% 1998 2/3 1.0 4.5 58.0% 63.8% 41.6% 56.1% 41.8% 54.5% 38.0%
24 2002 5/6 5.4 1.6 56.8% 70.1% 51.4% 61.4% 54.2% 62.0% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 16/16 7.2 2.5 56.4% 71.8% 48.8% 56.9% 51.0% 61.8% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 11/11 5.5 3.0 57.3% 69.9% 43.5% 65.1% 34.7% 58.5% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 25/25 7.3 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 42.7% 57.6% 34.8% 58.9% 33.4% 2002 1/1 3.0 5.0 66.0% 54.7% 45.5% 50.0% 16.7% 51.5% 30.0%
28 2006 27/27 4.4 3.2 65.9% 65.9% 42.1% 57.7% 46.3% 57.8% 37.9% 2003 5/5 2.6 5.2 66.0% 53.7% 39.4% 47.4% 31.3% 48.6% 36.2%
29 2007 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.0% 69.1% 44.6% 52.0% 44.1% 59.5% 33.2% 2004 1/1 2.0 3.0 71.6% 55.6% 44.0% 50.0% 25.0% 52.3% 32.5%
30 2008 21/23 6.0 3.2 58.6% 67.1% 43.2% 57.4% 44.1% 57.2% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 2/2 4.0 6.5 52.9% 63.0% 36.1% 58.0% 25.0% 50.6% 18.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180/190 5.8 3.0 58.6% 68.6% 44.7% 56.6% 43.0% 58.7% 35.3% — 14/17 1.9 5.2 63.2% 57.3% 40.5% 51.4% 34.7% 50.7% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jiri Vanek Todd Larkham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1995 1506 98.4 -2.42 +0.35 0.841 45.6% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1479 106.0 -1.47 -1.25 0.720 43.1% — — — 28.6% -1.71 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
22 2000 1592 125.0 -1.75 -0.49 0.907 48.7% -27 +29 — 45.6% -0.15 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.43 1997 1494 111.1 -0.73 -1.04 0.572 40.8% +1 — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — -0.50
23 2001 1534 129.4 -2.36 -1.10 0.873 47.5% -15 +85 — 39.0% -0.76 2–7 (22%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.01 1998 1486 107.5 -1.57 +0.52 0.834 46.5% — — — 50.0% +0.30 0–2 — — +0.28
24 2002 1533 112.7 +0.13 -0.05 0.893 48.7% -3 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 1546 123.4 -0.16 -1.98 0.920 48.6% -35 +88 — 44.7% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 1534 107.9 -1.90 -0.97 0.873 47.3% -3 +73 — 41.4% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.51 2001 1475 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1501 112.6 -2.39 -3.28 0.814 46.3% -3 +44 — 30.2% -1.19 5–4 (56%) 4–12 (25%) — -0.01 2002 1464 108.4 +1.68 +1.01 0.619 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.18
28 2006 1552 124.5 -2.92 -0.30 0.898 48.0% -20 +4 -48 41.5% -0.51 1–6 (14%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.18 2003 1566 110.5 -2.83 -1.03 0.705 42.5% -49 — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–1 — -0.30
29 2007 1578 121.4 -2.67 -1.97 0.819 46.9% -83 +67 — 36.2% -1.04 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.50 2004 1563 110.3 +1.88 +4.34 0.680 43.0% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.27
30 2008 1564 117.1 -3.67 -2.26 0.786 46.0% -66 +59 — 35.9% -1.23 4–5 (44%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1577 111.7 -3.01 +0.23 0.377 37.8% — — — 0.0% -3.60 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1548 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1647 125.9 -2.28 -1.45 0.854 47.3% -30 +52 -48 38.7% -0.82 27–39 (41%) 41–42 (49%) 100.0 +0.02 — 1607 116.4 -1.29 -0.30 0.679 42.6% -24 — — 29.8% -1.63 0–5 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.5 -5.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.