H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jiri Vesely vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 2-2
Jiri Vesely and Daniel Gimeno-Traver are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jiri Vesely leads 2–1 on clay, while Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Vesely won the 2018 Istanbul third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2018* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 6-3 6-1 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2015* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2015* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2014* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 7-5 6-3 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vesely | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |