H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jiri Vesely vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-2
Dominic Thiem holds a 2–1 lead over Jiri Vesely in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on clay, while Jiri Vesely leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jiri Vesely won the 2016 Wimbledon second round 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jiri Vesely | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2014* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-3 7-6(3) | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 7-5 6-0 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vesely | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |