H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Vesely vs Jack Sock H2H: 1-3
Jack Sock holds a 3–1 lead over Jiri Vesely in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jack Sock leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Vesely won the 2017 Roland Garros first round 7-5 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 7-5 7-5 6-3 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| May 17, 2017* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jack Sock | 6-4 3-6 7-6(1) | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2017* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jack Sock | 6-3 7-6(0) | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2014* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jack Sock | 6-2 6-1 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vesely | Jack Sock | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |