H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jiri Vesely vs Tim van Rijthoven H2H: 1-0
Jiri Vesely holds a 1–0 lead over Tim van Rijthoven in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Vesely leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jiri Vesely won the 2016 Winston-Salem second round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2016* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jiri Vesely | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Tim van Rijthoven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tim van Rijthoven | #871 | #101 | 546 | 1,759 | 10 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vesely | Tim van Rijthoven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #874 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |