H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Joao Sousa vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 2-2

Joao Sousa and Feliciano Lopez are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Joao Sousa leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Feliciano Lopez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2016 US Open second round 6-2 6-4 1-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Joao Sousa
POR Age 37 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Joao Sousa #36 6-2 6-4 1-6 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #18 Match data
Oct 8, 2015* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Joao Sousa #45 6-4 4-6 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #15 Match data
Jun 18, 2015* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Feliciano Lopez #14 6-3 6-4 Joao Sousa #44 Match data
May 30, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Feliciano Lopez #43 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 Joao Sousa #119 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Joao Sousa #954 #28 1,355 1,917 189 247 43.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joao Sousa Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2008 1–1 50.0% #592 1,550 0 0 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2011 1–1 50.0% #192 1,507 0 0 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2012 3–4 42.9% #101 1,587 0 0 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2013 14–13 51.9% #49 1,796 0 1 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2014 23–33 41.1% #54 1,741 0 1 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2015 34–30 53.1% #33 1,904 0 2 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2016 24–32 42.9% #43 1,802 0 2 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2017 22–30 42.3% #57 1,734 0 2 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2018 25–26 49.0% #44 1,783 0 3 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2019 25–28 47.2% #60 1,756 0 3 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2020 0–9 0.0% #90 1,606 0 3 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2021 1–12 7.7% #140 1,545 0 3 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2022 13–20 39.4% #82 1,565 0 4 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2023 3–7 30.0% #249 1,509 0 4 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2024 0–1 0.0% #726 1,503 0 4 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7