H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 19:16 UTC
Joao Sousa vs Fernando Verdasco
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Joao Sousa vs Fernando Verdasco.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Sousa | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 |