H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Joao Sousa vs Guido Pella H2H: 2-2
Joao Sousa and Guido Pella are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guido Pella leads 2–1 on clay, while Joao Sousa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guido Pella won the 2019 Barcelona second round 3-6 7-6(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2019* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Guido Pella | 3-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2019* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Joao Sousa | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Guido Pella | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | Guido Pella | Match data |
| May 29, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Guido Pella | 6-2 6-3 6-4 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Sousa | Guido Pella | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |