H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Joao Sousa vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-1
Joao Sousa and Guillermo Garcia-Lopez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2013 Valencia third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2013* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 6-3 7-5 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-1 6-1 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Sousa | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |