H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Joao Sousa vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 2-0

Joao Sousa holds a 2–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joao Sousa leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2018 Indian Wells Open first round 4-6 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Joao Sousa
POR Age 37 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joao Sousa #85 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) Mikhail Youzhny #95 Match data Mar 10, 2018* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Joao Sousa #62 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #99 Match data Aug 2, 2017* R32 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Joao Sousa #954 #28 1,355 1,916 190 250 43.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 482 408 54.2% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joao Sousa Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,532 0 0
19 2008 1–1 50.0% #592 1,550 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,695 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,867 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2011 1–1 50.0% #192 1,507 0 0 2004 41–26 61.2% #16 1,883 0 2
23 2012 3–4 42.9% #101 1,587 0 0 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,760 0 2
24 2013 14–13 51.9% #49 1,797 0 1 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,826 0 2
25 2014 23–34 40.4% #54 1,738 0 1 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,890 0 3
26 2015 34–30 53.1% #33 1,904 0 2 2008 26–20 56.5% #32 1,771 0 4
27 2016 25–33 43.1% #43 1,805 0 2 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,962 0 5
28 2017 22–30 42.3% #57 1,735 0 2 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,944 0 7
29 2018 25–26 49.0% #44 1,782 0 3 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,838 0 7
30 2019 25–28 47.2% #60 1,757 0 3 2012 33–22 60.0% #25 1,892 0 8
31 2020 0–9 0.0% #90 1,607 0 3 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,015 0 10
32 2021 1–13 7.1% #140 1,534 0 3 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,797 0 10
33 2022 13–20 39.4% #82 1,565 0 4 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2023 3–7 30.0% #249 1,510 0 4 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,781 0 10
35 2024 0–1 0.0% #726 1,503 0 4 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,682 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,650 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Joao Sousa Mikhail Youzhny
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 10 10 20 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 18 13 31 58.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
23 2012 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2014 12 18 30 40.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 24 12 36 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 2015 18 17 35 51.4% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2008 19 14 33 57.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2016 12 20 32 37.5% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 27 16 43 62.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2017 10 14 24 41.7% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 12 5 17 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2018 15 17 32 46.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2019 11 12 23 47.8% 10 12 22 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2012 20 13 33 60.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2020 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 20 15 35 57.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
32 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
35 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
Career — 97 127 224 43.3% 79 98 177 44.6% 14 25 39 35.9% — — — — — 262 220 482 54.4% 126 122 248 50.8% 61 47 108 56.5% 33 19 52 63.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 436/440 of Joao Sousa's and 852/890 of Mikhail Youzhny's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Joao Sousa Mikhail Youzhny
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 1/1 5.0 2.0 55.1% 70.4% 36.4% 25.0% 0.0% 55.1% 33.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 11/13 2.9 2.9 60.2% 66.1% 50.0% 53.7% 40.2% 59.9% 35.0%
19 2008 2/2 3.5 1.5 58.6% 67.3% 65.4% 70.8% 31.3% 66.6% 39.5% 2001 34/38 3.4 2.6 62.0% 68.1% 49.9% 55.5% 45.4% 61.1% 39.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 39/52 2.7 2.6 63.7% 68.2% 50.6% 58.4% 45.3% 61.8% 39.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 53/54 3.0 2.8 57.2% 67.1% 48.5% 58.0% 37.1% 59.2% 39.4%
22 2011 2/2 3.0 1.0 60.3% 61.5% 41.4% 29.8% 58.3% 53.5% 34.6% 2004 63/67 5.4 2.9 57.6% 72.2% 52.4% 59.3% 42.9% 63.6% 38.4%
23 2012 7/7 2.1 3.1 59.5% 66.3% 47.7% 45.8% 29.7% 59.0% 40.6% 2005 44/44 4.1 2.6 57.0% 70.9% 53.2% 51.4% 50.5% 63.2% 40.7%
24 2013 27/27 2.9 2.3 61.8% 68.0% 46.5% 57.4% 38.5% 59.6% 36.1% 2006 44/45 3.9 2.5 58.5% 69.1% 51.2% 56.8% 43.6% 61.5% 39.5%
25 2014 56/57 2.7 2.1 60.3% 67.6% 48.1% 61.1% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1% 2007 68/72 4.9 2.1 59.9% 73.2% 53.4% 63.5% 45.9% 65.1% 39.9%
26 2015 64/64 3.0 2.1 59.2% 70.2% 51.9% 61.3% 42.7% 62.8% 37.0% 2008 43/46 4.7 2.4 62.9% 72.4% 52.8% 69.2% 48.4% 65.1% 38.8%
27 2016 56/58 3.4 2.2 63.4% 69.2% 47.7% 50.2% 42.9% 61.2% 36.5% 2009 68/68 3.9 2.2 61.9% 71.9% 52.9% 54.5% 41.4% 64.6% 38.7%
28 2017 52/52 4.5 2.8 58.5% 72.3% 49.8% 56.2% 38.4% 62.7% 36.5% 2010 58/59 4.3 2.7 63.4% 72.1% 52.3% 58.7% 44.5% 64.9% 40.1%
29 2018 51/51 4.2 2.4 60.3% 72.2% 49.4% 49.3% 35.8% 63.1% 37.5% 2011 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.7% 70.1% 53.0% 53.9% 41.5% 63.4% 38.3%
30 2019 53/53 5.1 1.8 61.7% 70.5% 49.4% 55.1% 38.5% 62.3% 34.5% 2012 53/55 4.4 2.2 62.1% 71.8% 54.6% 61.1% 43.6% 65.1% 39.8%
31 2020 9/9 4.3 2.9 57.1% 63.3% 48.5% 51.5% 35.3% 56.6% 31.7% 2013 63/63 4.4 2.5 62.2% 71.0% 50.7% 66.4% 45.0% 63.3% 38.2%
32 2021 13/14 2.7 2.2 59.1% 63.1% 44.6% 47.1% 31.2% 54.6% 33.4% 2014 41/42 3.5 2.4 62.7% 66.9% 53.0% 56.4% 40.9% 61.6% 38.7%
33 2022 33/33 3.6 2.4 62.3% 67.9% 49.2% 54.1% 34.8% 60.9% 37.2% 2015 33/33 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.7% 50.2% 49.6% 35.8% 59.6% 33.1%
34 2023 10/10 2.1 2.0 59.4% 62.8% 43.7% 49.1% 35.6% 55.3% 31.3% 2016 35/37 3.7 3.2 59.4% 67.4% 52.1% 59.9% 40.2% 61.3% 37.0%
35 2024 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.3% 64.4% 51.4% 50.0% 25.0% 58.8% 34.7% 2017 30/30 3.7 3.6 60.5% 67.3% 48.1% 61.1% 43.3% 59.4% 35.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 25/25 3.4 3.8 60.6% 67.6% 49.5% 55.8% 32.8% 60.4% 35.1%
Career — 436/440 3.6 2.2 60.6% 69.3% 48.9% 55.0% 38.5% 61.2% 36.1% — 852/890 4.0 2.7 60.6% 70.1% 51.8% 58.6% 43.0% 62.8% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Joao Sousa Mikhail Youzhny
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1494 101.7 -2.13 -1.94 0.742 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.07
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1532 116.4 -1.96 -1.12 0.873 47.6% +26 — — 42.4% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -0.21
19 2008 1551 109.7 -0.19 -0.49 1.182 54.2% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.24 2001 1695 126.0 -1.14 +1.28 1.015 50.1% -22 -188 -31 51.5% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 13–8 (62%) 101.0 +0.55
20 2009 1550 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1867 145.9 +0.65 +2.55 1.032 50.8% -141 -102 -103 54.4% +0.46 10–10 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 105.2 -3.92
21 2010 1543 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1746 135.3 -1.76 +1.88 0.964 49.2% -42 +20 +25 50.4% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 10–9 (53%) 100.2 -1.28
22 2011 1507 100.3 -2.74 +2.42 0.742 44.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20 2004 1883 148.3 +0.81 +2.00 1.057 50.9% +22 -143 -152 58.0% +0.41 15–10 (60%) 19–14 (58%) 106.2 -1.36
23 2012 1587 111.9 -2.10 -0.18 0.991 49.4% — +54 — 41.2% -0.77 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.38 2005 1761 139.5 +1.26 +2.88 1.104 51.5% +3 -18 +10 53.6% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 92.4 +0.69
24 2013 1797 138.5 -2.50 -0.67 0.896 48.2% -3 -191 — 47.9% -0.34 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 107.8 +0.54 2006 1827 146.7 -0.47 +1.85 1.025 50.4% +34 -99 -76 50.0% -0.04 7–3 (70%) 9–5 (64%) 106.6 -1.02
25 2014 1738 146.5 -2.75 -1.03 0.869 47.5% +1 -106 -36 39.7% -0.87 12–10 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 104.6 -0.16 2007 1890 156.9 +2.28 +3.67 1.144 52.4% +38 -97 -62 63.0% +0.84 12–9 (57%) 12–13 (48%) 101.7 -1.21
26 2015 1904 152.2 -1.01 +1.38 0.995 49.9% -46 -72 -203 50.0% 0.00 15–9 (63%) 12–15 (44%) 105.2 -0.31 2008 1772 147.1 +2.15 +1.93 1.109 52.1% +23 -16 +129 59.0% +0.71 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 91.4 +1.14
27 2016 1806 151.2 -1.66 +0.21 0.941 48.8% +1 +17 -112 44.7% -0.45 9–13 (41%) 6–9 (40%) 95.1 +1.35 2009 1963 152.1 +1.37 +2.31 1.091 51.3% +17 -170 -95 55.3% +0.51 17–6 (74%) 12–16 (43%) 108.6 -1.41
28 2017 1736 145.9 -0.81 -0.18 0.979 49.7% +18 +58 -117 46.3% -0.23 7–14 (33%) 8–12 (40%) 90.3 +2.40 2010 1944 153.8 +1.60 +3.59 1.144 52.5% +51 -65 -122 62.6% +0.83 15–9 (63%) 19–13 (59%) 100.3 +2.19
29 2018 1783 147.5 -0.33 +1.07 1.015 50.0% +38 -32 -147 46.7% -0.07 14–11 (56%) 12–10 (55%) 101.9 +1.17 2011 1839 149.8 +0.30 +1.58 1.047 50.8% +13 +8 +51 53.5% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 96.9 +0.33
30 2019 1758 141.2 -1.27 -1.02 0.916 48.4% +5 -7 -4 45.8% -0.41 13–10 (57%) 11–13 (46%) 101.4 -0.09 2012 1893 159.3 +1.93 +3.49 1.139 52.2% -5 -19 +111 56.5% +0.59 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) 102.6 -1.62
31 2020 1608 110.6 -2.88 -2.72 0.729 44.1% +41 +32 — 8.7% -2.35 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.04 2013 2015 164.9 +0.69 +2.03 1.041 51.0% -59 -9 +84 59.5% +0.53 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) 102.8 -0.08
32 2021 1534 111.8 -5.26 -2.49 0.736 44.3% +92 +15 — 17.1% -2.14 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.3 +0.37 2014 1797 144.6 -1.83 +1.95 1.007 50.1% +17 +64 +233 48.5% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 7–8 (47%) 93.0 +2.82
33 2022 1565 131.7 -1.95 -0.02 0.952 48.8% +14 +70 +27 40.2% -0.41 6–6 (50%) 6–12 (33%) 99.0 +0.40 2015 1702 140.9 -2.85 -2.15 0.819 46.5% +90 -22 +196 30.3% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -0.03
34 2023 1510 117.4 -3.91 -3.09 0.700 43.9% — +62 — 32.0% -1.80 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 -0.20 2016 1781 137.7 -1.76 +0.85 0.955 49.4% +35 -167 +92 54.0% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 99.2 -0.48
35 2024 1504 100.9 +0.27 +1.28 0.840 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10 2017 1683 134.2 -3.41 -0.63 0.861 47.7% +46 -135 +177 43.6% -0.49 2–9 (18%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +1.50
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1651 126.8 -2.94 -0.47 0.887 47.6% +27 -111 +190 35.0% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.1 +0.38
Career — 1917 144.3 -1.66 -0.16 0.928 48.6% +4 -9 -83 43.2% -0.48 86–82 (51%) 77–93 (45%) 99.0 +1.42 — 2069 153.2 +0.17 +1.94 1.036 50.6% +9 -65 +30 53.8% +0.27 149–141 (51%) 181–165 (52%) 100.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.