H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Joao Sousa vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 2-0
Joao Sousa holds a 2–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joao Sousa leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2018 Indian Wells Masters first round 4-6 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2017* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Joao Sousa | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Sousa | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |