H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Joao Sousa vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-2
Joao Sousa and Sergiy Stakhovsky are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Joao Sousa leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2018 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-3 5-7 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-3 5-7 1-6 6-4 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2017* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2013* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-4 6-3 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Joao Sousa | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |