H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Joao Souza vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-1
Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Souza in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2012 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-6(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 6-3 7-6(1) 6-2 | Joao Souza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Souza | #1,306 | #69 | 687 | 1,669 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Souza | Matthew Ebden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #142 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |