H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Joey Rive vs Vijay Amritraj H2H: 1-0
Joey Rive holds a 1–0 lead over Vijay Amritraj in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joey Rive leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Joey Rive won the 1990 Wimbledon first round 5-7 6-4 6-4 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Joey Rive | 5-7 6-4 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Vijay Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joey Rive | #968 | #57 | 331 | 1,737 | 54 | 71 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vijay Amritraj | #1,178 | #18 | 69 | 2,005 | 390 | 294 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joey Rive | Vijay Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 48–28 | 63.2% | #39 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #497 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #29 | 1,945 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #31 | 1,831 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #46 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1988 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #80 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #58 | 1,763 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,822 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 1990 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #19 | 1,982 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,904 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,843 | 0 | 14 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #382 | 1,685 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #80 | 1,698 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #106 | 1,685 | 0 | 16 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #221 | 1,676 | 0 | 16 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,660 | 0 | 16 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #280 | 1,606 | 0 | 16 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #687 | 1,542 | 0 | 16 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,528 | 0 | 16 |