H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Johan Kriek vs Ilie Nastase H2H: 1-3
Ilie Nastase holds a 3–1 lead over Johan Kriek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ilie Nastase leads 2–0 on carpet, while Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1983 Bristol fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1983* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Johan Kriek | 6-3 6-1 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ilie Nastase | 4-6 7-6 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1980* | Birmingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ilie Nastase | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1979* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ilie Nastase | 7-5 6-4 | Johan Kriek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Ilie Nastase | #1,075 | #1 | 0 | 2,260 | 859 | 331 | 72.2% | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 55 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johan Kriek | Ilie Nastase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 41–14 | 74.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1970 | 60–20 | 75.0% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1971 | 73–13 | 84.9% | — | 2,079 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1972 | 106–20 | 84.1% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1973 | 118–17 | 87.4% | #1 | 2,208 | 2 | 41 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1974 | 80–21 | 79.2% | #10 | 2,153 | 2 | 48 |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | 1975 | 91–21 | 81.2% | #7 | 2,170 | 2 | 54 |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | 1976 | 76–17 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,179 | 2 | 59 |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | 1977 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,092 | 2 | 62 |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | 1978 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #16 | 2,059 | 2 | 64 |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | 1979 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #49 | 1,795 | 2 | 64 |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #77 | 1,740 | 2 | 64 |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | 1981 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #74 | 1,730 | 2 | 64 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,633 | 2 | 64 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #118 | 1,595 | 2 | 64 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,574 | 2 | 64 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #431 | 1,535 | 2 | 64 |