H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Johan Kriek vs Rod Frawley H2H: 1-0

Johan Kriek holds a 1–0 lead over Rod Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1980 Melbourne Indoor round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Johan Kriek
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rod Frawley
AUS Age 73 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Johan Kriek #17 6-4 6-2 Rod Frawley #53 Match data Oct 24, 1980* R16 Melbourne Indoor ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,053 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14
Rod Frawley #483 #43 0 1,814 112 143 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Johan Kriek Rod Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,448 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 3–5 37.5% — 1,435 0 0
19 1977 1–2 33.3% — 1,510 0 0 1972 4–6 40.0% — 1,460 0 0
20 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,782 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,972 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,954 1 4 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,478 0 0
24 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,962 2 7 1977 3–10 23.1% #207 1,419 0 0
25 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,953 2 10 1978 7–15 31.8% #142 1,505 0 0
26 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,917 2 12 1979 11–15 42.3% #86 1,583 0 0
27 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,908 2 13 1980 29–23 55.8% #44 1,774 0 0
28 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,863 2 13 1981 20–24 45.5% #89 1,752 0 0
29 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,735 2 14 1982 22–23 48.9% #87 1,686 0 1
30 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,787 2 14 1983 10–14 41.7% #100 1,597 0 1
31 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14 1984 1–3 25.0% #385 1,576 0 1
32 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14 — — — — — — —
33 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14 — — — — — — —
34 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Johan Kriek Rod Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 1978 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1979 17 8 25 68.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 16 9 25 64.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 20 12 32 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 20 3 23 87.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1976 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1983 16 7 23 69.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1978 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1984 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1979 5 8 13 38.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1985 20 10 30 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 5 14 64.3% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
28 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 9 13 30.8%
29 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 101 269 62.5% 26 26 52 50.0% 85 32 117 72.6% 101 64 165 61.2% — 24 35 59 40.7% 17 28 45 37.8% 56 51 107 52.3% 15 29 44 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Johan Kriek Rod Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1480 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1448 91.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1435 97.3 — — — — +44 — +62 31.6% -1.11 — 0–2 — +0.93
19 1977 1510 107.6 — — — — +46 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 1972 1461 104.7 — — — — +33 — +47 45.8% -0.46 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 +0.88
20 1978 1782 136.9 — — — — +25 -221 — 61.9% +0.76 8–5 (62%) 9–4 (69%) 108.1 +2.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1979 1862 149.4 — — — — +23 -302 -259 55.6% +0.44 10–3 (77%) 7–4 (64%) 107.6 -2.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 1972 159.2 — — — — +53 — -325 58.6% +0.56 14–10 (58%) 13–8 (62%) 103.0 -5.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1955 142.9 — — — — -47 -363 +33 65.9% +0.70 6–0 (100%) 15–4 (79%) 112.6 +0.70 1976 1478 107.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–0 — +0.07
24 1982 1962 157.3 — — — — +5 -398 +50 61.3% +0.80 14–7 (67%) 16–10 (62%) 105.1 -3.28 1977 1419 104.2 — — — — +46 — +53 28.1% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.55
25 1983 1953 150.2 — — — — +24 -328 +86 59.6% +0.58 17–3 (85%) 12–10 (55%) 108.5 -1.61 1978 1506 130.8 — — — — — +23 +24 33.9% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 101.3 -0.84
26 1984 1918 146.2 — — — — -47 -258 +141 63.1% +0.71 12–9 (57%) 14–11 (56%) 99.0 -1.32 1979 1584 123.2 — — — — -108 -25 -1 47.2% -0.06 5–8 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +1.69
27 1985 1908 150.1 — — — — +32 — +92 61.3% +0.86 11–4 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 105.2 -0.23 1980 1775 142.4 — — — — -97 -151 -51 53.8% +0.06 13–9 (59%) 14–6 (70%) 114.9 -0.59
28 1986 1864 141.9 — — — — -4 -100 — 52.9% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 9–8 (53%) 102.1 -1.64 1981 1752 129.5 — — — — -133 -186 +83 47.1% -0.15 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 102.3 +0.07
29 1987 1735 137.6 — — — — +31 0 +199 52.4% +0.17 9–3 (75%) 9–9 (50%) 101.6 +0.53 1982 1687 132.2 — — — — -50 -111 +112 47.0% -0.50 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) 109.6 -1.34
30 1988 1787 141.9 — — — — +27 -88 +71 54.9% +0.42 9–8 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 96.8 -1.26 1983 1597 116.8 — — — — +21 0 +66 44.1% -0.39 3–5 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 +1.26
31 1989 1701 126.3 — — — — +60 — +98 50.9% +0.11 4–1 (80%) 3–6 (33%) 100.0 -0.30 1984 1577 104.3 — — — — +18 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — +0.45
32 1990 1683 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 1612 105.7 -0.37 -1.49 0.860 47.3% +75 — +134 34.8% -1.09 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1992 1593 98.2 -3.07 -0.54 0.818 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2054 152.6 -0.71 -1.37 0.855 47.0% +19 -242 +56 58.3% +0.51 125–60 (68%) 126–95 (57%) 109.9 -2.17 — 1815 131.3 — — — — -67 -74 +48 44.8% -0.43 45–44 (51%) 51–41 (55%) 109.6 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.