H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
John Isner vs Albert Montanes H2H: 2-0
John Isner holds a 2–0 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2010 Auckland semifinal 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2010* | Auckland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | John Isner | 6-2 7-6(5) | Albert Montanes | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2009* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Albert Montanes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |