H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John Isner vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 0-4
Jeremy Chardy holds a 4–0 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2015 Canada Masters quarterfinal 6-7(9) 7-6(13) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2015* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Jeremy Chardy | 6-7(9) 7-6(13) 7-6(4) | John Isner | Match data |
| May 28, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jeremy Chardy | 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-3 | John Isner | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2013* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jeremy Chardy | 7-6(7) 6-3 | John Isner | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2009* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jeremy Chardy | 6-7(1) 6-3 4-1 (ret.) | John Isner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | Jeremy Chardy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |