H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John Isner vs John Millman H2H: 4-0
John Isner holds a 4–0 lead over John Millman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2020 Cincinnati Masters third round 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2020* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | John Isner | 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | John Millman | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2019* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | John Isner | 7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(4) | John Millman | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | John Isner | 6-7(4) 7-6(12) 7-6(7) 7-5 | John Millman | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2015* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | John Isner | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | John Millman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| John Millman | #1,164 | #33 | 1,530 | 1,899 | 113 | 143 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Isner | John Millman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #92 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #48 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #72 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2022 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #147 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #483 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |