H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

John Isner vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 2-3

Jurgen Melzer holds a 3–2 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2015 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #20 6-3 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #86 Match data
May 13, 2014* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jurgen Melzer #67 7-6(7) 6-3 John Isner #11 Match data
Aug 23, 2012* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R16 Hard John Isner #10 6-4 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #36 Match data
Feb 25, 2012* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Jurgen Melzer #38 6-3 7-6(6) John Isner #13 Match data
Feb 28, 2008* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Jurgen Melzer #61 6-7(8) 6-3 7-6(4) John Isner #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16 — — — — — — —