H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

John Isner vs Tsung-Hua Yang H2H: 1-0

John Isner holds a 1–0 lead over Tsung-Hua Yang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Isner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Isner won the 2010 China Open first round 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tsung-Hua Yang
TPE Age 35 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Isner #22 7-6(5) 6-3 Tsung-Hua Yang #276 Match data Oct 7, 2010* R32 China Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,068 470 294 61.5% 0 1 0 0 15 16
Tsung-Hua Yang #1,236 #164 320 1,544 0 4 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Isner Tsung-Hua Yang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–3 0.0% #305 1,518 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #256 1,512 0 0
22 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,829 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,884 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,020 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2012 41–19 68.3% #14 1,977 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,984 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,935 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,028 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,021 0 10 — — — — — — —
32 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,985 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,958 0 14 — — — — — — —
34 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,922 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,945 0 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,925 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,711 0 16 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Isner Tsung-Hua Yang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1467 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1467 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1518 116.0 -2.84 -0.09 0.625 44.9% +16 — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.10
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1493 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1512 110.8 -0.28 +0.88 0.828 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.08
22 2007 1656 138.0 +5.43 -3.75 0.947 49.4% +37 — — 54.1% -0.19 5–1 (83%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.01 2013 1483 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1608 128.0 +4.14 -6.69 0.881 48.3% +39 -96 -116 41.0% -0.51 4–8 (33%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.16 2014 1500 105.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1830 145.6 +4.72 -4.63 0.972 50.0% +1 -280 — 57.0% +0.23 12–6 (67%) 26–12 (68%) — +0.93 2015 1470 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1885 154.2 +5.86 -4.84 1.002 50.5% +41 -194 — 58.8% +0.34 19–9 (68%) 32–16 (67%) — +2.28 2016 1451 96.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 2020 160.4 +7.13 -3.98 1.097 51.5% +30 -361 -297 61.6% +0.53 11–11 (50%) 32–20 (62%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1978 157.8 +7.12 -4.36 1.092 51.3% +43 -260 -71 62.7% +0.43 15–10 (60%) 38–18 (68%) — +3.35 2018 1442 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1985 159.0 +7.64 -3.71 1.119 51.3% +52 -198 -94 59.5% +0.36 18–11 (62%) 36–17 (68%) — +3.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1935 157.9 +7.20 -4.42 1.079 50.8% +50 -99 -27 61.8% +0.44 12–6 (67%) 41–21 (66%) — +3.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 2029 168.0 +8.71 -4.22 1.132 51.6% +54 -121 -120 62.7% +0.57 12–9 (57%) 39–25 (61%) — +3.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 2021 163.0 +8.76 -3.60 1.179 51.8% +44 -140 -79 58.6% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 31–30 (51%) — +1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1986 158.3 +8.00 -5.60 1.094 51.2% +14 -91 -60 60.0% +0.42 11–9 (55%) 40–24 (63%) — +3.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1959 158.8 +8.37 -4.32 1.129 51.3% -23 -61 +77 57.0% +0.42 14–11 (56%) 37–32 (54%) — +2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1922 154.7 +8.16 -3.97 1.178 51.7% -6 — +115 61.2% +0.47 8–7 (53%) 29–23 (56%) — +3.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1846 134.4 +4.91 -4.34 1.035 50.7% +22 — — 60.9% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 14–7 (67%) — +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1945 152.3 +6.93 -5.43 1.006 50.2% 0 +9 — 62.5% +0.27 10–5 (67%) 21–9 (70%) — +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1926 145.5 +6.21 -5.79 0.996 49.8% -21 +13 +80 55.1% -0.02 11–8 (58%) 30–17 (64%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1711 125.8 +5.40 -5.66 1.012 49.9% +36 — +244 45.3% -0.14 3–6 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2068 162.0 +7.10 -4.58 1.071 50.9% +25 -137 -39 58.7% +0.34 177–130 (58%) 482–307 (61%) 111.1 +4.58 — 1545 108.8 -2.20 +0.15 0.666 45.8% +16 — — 11.1% -1.44 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -4.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.