H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

John Millman vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 1-2

Federico Delbonis holds a 2–1 lead over John Millman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Federico Delbonis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2019 Miami Open second round 7-5 3-6 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Millman
AUS Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Federico Delbonis
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Federico Delbonis #83 7-5 3-6 7-6(2) John Millman #39 Match data Mar 23, 2019* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
John Millman #37 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 Federico Delbonis #80 Match data Jan 16, 2019* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Federico Delbonis #87 6-4 6-4 John Millman #52 Match data Jul 20, 2018* R16 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Millman #1,164 #33 1,530 1,902 115 145 44.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,898 158 196 44.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Millman Federico Delbonis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,455 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,551 0 0
21 2010 0–1 0.0% #204 1,510 0 0 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,715 0 0
22 2011 0–1 0.0% #541 1,485 0 0 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,748 0 0
23 2012 0–1 0.0% #199 1,559 0 0 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,659 0 1
24 2013 2–4 33.3% #190 1,651 0 0 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,693 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2016 24–23 51.1% #41 1,752 0 2
26 2015 5–9 35.7% #92 1,708 0 0 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,810 0 2
27 2016 19–21 47.5% #84 1,820 0 0 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,722 0 2
28 2017 3–5 37.5% #128 1,820 0 0 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2
29 2018 19–19 50.0% #38 1,837 0 0 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2
30 2019 20–27 42.6% #48 1,776 0 0 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,715 0 2
31 2020 14–13 51.9% #38 1,820 0 1 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,671 0 2
32 2021 22–25 46.8% #72 1,774 0 1 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,598 0 2
33 2022 9–17 34.6% #147 1,669 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2023 2–2 50.0% #483 1,710 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Millman Federico Delbonis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — —
22 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 2 12 14 14.3% 18 13 31 58.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2013 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 10 14 24 41.7% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2015 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
27 2016 15 17 32 46.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2018 1 4 5 20.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2018 10 10 20 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 2020 1 5 6 16.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — —
30 2019 14 16 30 46.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2021 0 10 10 0.0% 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2020 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2021 13 15 28 46.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2023 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2022 7 11 18 38.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 83 98 181 45.9% 19 29 48 39.6% 13 18 31 41.9% — 25 71 96 26.0% 133 113 246 54.1% 0 12 12 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 256/260 of John Millman's and 352/354 of Federico Delbonis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age John Millman Federico Delbonis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 2.0 1.0 59.7% 62.5% 48.1% 28.6% 33.3% 56.7% 39.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 5.5 4.0 51.0% 65.3% 51.2% 42.5% 100.0% 58.0% 30.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 2.6 2.6 55.3% 72.4% 57.3% 71.3% 49.8% 65.7% 42.1%
21 2010 1/1 1.0 4.0 51.9% 51.9% 40.0% 16.7% 33.3% 46.2% 30.4% 2012 15/15 2.6 2.7 62.6% 71.7% 50.7% 57.0% 45.9% 63.6% 38.8%
22 2011 1/1 4.0 3.0 76.3% 72.4% 33.3% 50.0% 66.7% 63.2% 35.3% 2013 20/20 3.3 3.0 60.5% 71.8% 53.1% 65.2% 39.5% 64.6% 36.0%
23 2012 1/1 4.0 1.0 60.9% 64.3% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 58.7% 27.8% 2014 47/47 4.1 2.6 62.4% 71.1% 53.2% 58.2% 37.9% 64.5% 36.0%
24 2013 6/6 6.2 4.2 64.0% 66.5% 49.1% 64.2% 36.7% 59.8% 38.1% 2015 33/33 3.3 3.8 59.1% 68.0% 49.7% 53.1% 40.0% 60.5% 37.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 46/47 5.0 3.8 57.7% 72.7% 53.6% 54.7% 42.5% 64.7% 37.9%
26 2015 14/14 2.6 1.8 62.8% 71.2% 51.3% 44.5% 43.3% 63.5% 34.6% 2017 21/21 2.9 3.1 62.0% 69.3% 53.0% 58.4% 38.9% 63.1% 36.6%
27 2016 38/40 4.5 1.8 63.5% 66.4% 52.5% 49.3% 47.0% 61.4% 37.1% 2018 29/29 3.3 3.8 60.7% 68.1% 50.9% 59.1% 37.8% 61.4% 37.2%
28 2017 8/8 4.8 1.6 60.6% 63.7% 50.4% 55.2% 43.4% 58.7% 36.2% 2019 34/34 3.5 4.4 61.8% 67.3% 49.9% 55.2% 45.3% 60.6% 37.1%
29 2018 38/38 4.6 2.3 61.0% 70.3% 52.4% 60.1% 42.8% 63.0% 38.2% 2020 21/21 3.9 4.1 62.0% 69.7% 47.0% 59.5% 31.9% 60.8% 36.3%
30 2019 47/47 4.5 1.8 61.0% 68.9% 54.1% 60.1% 41.1% 63.1% 37.2% 2021 47/48 3.0 3.3 62.9% 67.9% 48.5% 58.5% 39.7% 60.8% 38.9%
31 2020 27/27 4.4 2.4 59.4% 68.8% 51.6% 60.4% 44.3% 61.9% 38.1% 2022 29/29 3.2 3.3 65.7% 65.9% 46.5% 52.3% 52.0% 59.2% 33.8%
32 2021 45/47 2.6 1.6 61.6% 67.4% 49.4% 54.0% 44.2% 60.5% 37.6% 2023 2/2 2.0 5.0 60.7% 63.1% 57.1% 66.7% 49.4% 61.2% 40.5%
33 2022 26/26 3.6 1.5 63.1% 65.1% 55.7% 51.3% 38.1% 61.8% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 4/4 4.3 2.3 64.9% 65.3% 45.2% 57.1% 38.7% 58.3% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 256/260 4.0 1.9 61.8% 67.8% 52.0% 55.3% 42.8% 61.8% 36.8% — 352/354 3.6 3.4 61.3% 69.3% 50.8% 57.1% 41.5% 62.2% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Millman Federico Delbonis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1531 104.9 +1.54 +1.69 0.900 47.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1455 98.1 -1.64 -4.62 0.728 44.6% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
20 2009 1499 99.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1551 118.9 +1.25 +1.71 1.229 53.8% — +96 — 63.6% +1.55 0–1 0–1 — +0.12
21 2010 1510 101.6 -1.31 -0.11 0.565 38.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.20 2012 1716 134.1 +0.78 +0.82 1.066 51.0% — +108 — 42.4% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 0.00
22 2011 1485 100.9 -0.78 -0.06 0.958 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16 2013 1748 139.4 +1.43 -0.37 1.017 50.3% -261 +198 — 56.3% +0.02 3–1 (75%) 9–4 (69%) 107.0 -0.16
23 2012 1560 110.5 -1.29 -1.40 0.673 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08 2014 1659 139.9 +0.59 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -187 +188 — 43.9% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 6–14 (30%) 92.5 +0.52
24 2013 1651 129.6 -0.78 -0.56 0.949 49.3% -14 — — 47.1% -0.18 0–3 (0%) — — -0.22 2015 1694 141.9 -2.55 +0.99 0.939 48.9% -227 +164 — 44.4% -0.62 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 102.2 -1.35
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1752 151.4 +0.81 +1.24 1.074 51.0% -113 +125 — 50.8% +0.09 8–11 (42%) 14–13 (52%) 101.9 +0.29
26 2015 1709 140.3 -0.75 +0.80 0.946 49.0% -23 — — 40.5% -0.32 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 99.0 -0.67 2017 1810 146.8 -0.28 -0.65 0.992 49.8% -88 +44 — 48.9% -0.02 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 104.7 -0.11
27 2016 1820 150.9 -1.72 +0.76 0.959 49.5% -29 — -82 44.2% +0.02 11–5 (69%) 4–12 (25%) 101.0 -1.72 2018 1722 141.7 -1.88 +0.36 0.963 49.3% -54 +64 — 39.7% -0.44 3–7 (30%) 6–9 (40%) 92.3 -1.63
28 2017 1821 134.6 -0.72 +1.14 0.875 47.8% -3 — — 40.0% -0.64 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.86 2019 1687 143.1 -2.47 +0.35 0.941 48.8% -62 +160 — 42.7% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 6–15 (29%) 94.2 +0.44
29 2018 1837 151.3 -0.74 +1.80 1.035 50.7% -4 -201 -51 49.5% +0.13 6–4 (60%) 8–11 (42%) 101.8 -2.15 2020 1706 134.9 -1.28 -1.40 0.926 48.8% -73 +115 — 45.3% -0.43 2–4 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 -0.54
30 2019 1777 152.2 -0.76 +1.53 1.008 50.3% +15 -140 -13 48.3% +0.08 5–13 (28%) 12–16 (43%) 92.9 +0.01 2021 1716 141.7 -1.58 +1.20 0.991 49.7% -195 +201 — 47.1% -0.02 10–5 (67%) 7–12 (37%) 100.2 +1.51
31 2020 1821 150.8 -1.03 +0.92 1.000 50.2% +33 -209 — 53.9% +0.16 5–8 (38%) 5–9 (36%) 95.4 -0.76 2022 1671 132.0 -3.23 -1.65 0.828 47.0% -137 +96 — 33.3% -1.01 2–5 (29%) 1–6 (14%) 90.2 -0.76
32 2021 1775 134.9 -2.12 +0.76 0.952 49.1% -1 -104 -52 45.2% -0.40 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) 103.8 +1.58 2023 1599 111.2 +1.18 -0.42 1.044 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 1–1 — -0.12
33 2022 1670 130.7 -1.67 -1.79 0.878 48.1% -5 -59 +49 37.5% -0.69 3–3 (50%) 7–10 (41%) 98.7 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1710 124.6 -0.07 -1.08 0.799 46.0% -6 — — 38.5% -0.54 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1704 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1902 148.8 -1.25 +0.75 0.964 49.5% -2 -141 -40 45.6% -0.16 44–50 (47%) 54–71 (43%) 96.1 -2.64 — 1898 145.2 -0.88 +0.15 0.979 49.6% -142 +141 — 45.0% -0.25 51–62 (45%) 69–91 (43%) 92.9 -0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.