H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
John Newcombe vs Chris Kachel H2H: 1-0
John Newcombe holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Kachel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Newcombe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Newcombe won the 1976 Rome third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 82
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1976* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | John Newcombe | 7-5 6-4 | Chris Kachel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Newcombe | #826 | #1 | 0 | 2,201 | 556 | 224 | 71.3% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 41 |
| Chris Kachel | #268 | #77 | 0 | 1,612 | 32 | 86 | 27.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Newcombe | Chris Kachel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #166 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #164 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #150 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #254 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 70–37 | 65.4% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 1,887 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #268 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 65–23 | 73.9% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1971 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,082 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1972 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,129 | 2 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1973 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,052 | 4 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1974 | 87–16 | 84.5% | #2 | 2,115 | 4 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #20 | 2,004 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #21 | 1,827 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #119 | 1,833 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #24 | 1,815 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #226 | 1,831 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,799 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,792 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |