H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
John Newcombe vs James Chico Hagey H2H: 1-1
John Newcombe and James Chico Hagey are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Newcombe leads 1–0 on grass, while James Chico Hagey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, James Chico Hagey won the 1976 Perth third round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 82
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1976* | Perth | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | James Chico Hagey | 7-6 7-6 | John Newcombe | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | John Newcombe | 8-9 9-8 6-4 6-1 | James Chico Hagey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Newcombe | #826 | #1 | 0 | 2,201 | 556 | 224 | 71.3% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 41 |
| James Chico Hagey | #662 | #72 | 0 | 1,558 | 18 | 50 | 26.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| John Newcombe | James Chico Hagey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 70–37 | 65.4% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 1,887 | 0 | 10 | 1972 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 65–23 | 73.9% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 14 | 1973 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,082 | 2 | 20 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,129 | 2 | 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,052 | 4 | 31 | 1976 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #73 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 87–16 | 84.5% | #2 | 2,115 | 4 | 40 | 1977 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #200 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #20 | 2,004 | 5 | 41 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #436 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #21 | 1,827 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #119 | 1,833 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #24 | 1,815 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #226 | 1,831 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,799 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,792 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |