H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
John Newcombe vs Richard Gonzalez H2H: 3-2
John Newcombe holds a 3–2 lead over Richard Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, John Newcombe leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, John Newcombe won the 1970 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-7 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1970* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | John Newcombe | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Richard Gonzalez | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1970 | Champions Classic | ATP 250 | RR | Carpet | Richard Gonzalez | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | John Newcombe | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1969* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Richard Gonzalez | 6-1 6-2 | John Newcombe | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1969* | Sydney | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | John Newcombe | 5-7 18-16 6-3 14-12 | Richard Gonzalez | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1968* | Boston 1 | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | John Newcombe | 6-4 6-3 | Richard Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Newcombe | #826 | #1 | 0 | 2,201 | 556 | 224 | 71.3% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 41 |
| Richard Gonzalez | — | — | — | 2,011 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| John Newcombe | Richard Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 70–37 | 65.4% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1969 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 1,887 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1970 | 65–23 | 73.9% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1971 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,082 | 2 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1972 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,129 | 2 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,052 | 4 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 87–16 | 84.5% | #2 | 2,115 | 4 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #20 | 2,004 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #21 | 1,827 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #119 | 1,833 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #24 | 1,815 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #226 | 1,831 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,799 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,792 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |