H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
John Newcombe vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 0-1
Vladimir Zednik holds a 1–0 lead over John Newcombe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vladimir Zednik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vladimir Zednik won the 1971 Hamburg third round 2-6 6-3 6-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 82
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1971* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Vladimir Zednik | 2-6 6-3 6-3 (ret.) | John Newcombe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Newcombe | #826 | #1 | 0 | 2,201 | 556 | 224 | 71.3% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 41 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Newcombe | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 70–37 | 65.4% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 1,887 | 0 | 10 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1970 | 65–23 | 73.9% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 14 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1971 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,082 | 2 | 20 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1972 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,129 | 2 | 27 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1973 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,052 | 4 | 31 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1974 | 87–16 | 84.5% | #2 | 2,115 | 4 | 40 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1975 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #20 | 2,004 | 5 | 41 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1976 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #21 | 1,827 | 5 | 41 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1977 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #119 | 1,833 | 5 | 41 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1978 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #24 | 1,815 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #226 | 1,831 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,799 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,792 | 5 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |