H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Alex Corretja H2H: 1-3
Alex Corretja holds a 3–1 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2002 Long Island fourth round 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2002* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2000* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-4 6-4 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1998* | Dubai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Alex Corretja | 6-3 6-3 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 6-2 4-6 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |