H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 4-0
Jonas Bjorkman holds a 4–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2005 Ho Chi Minh City third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Ho Chi Minh City | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-4 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 5-7 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1997* | Auckland | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 7-6(0) 6-0 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-4 6-4 1-0 (ret.) | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Kenneth Carlsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |