H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 3-2

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 3–2 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2004 Roland Garros round of 64 6-3 3-6 7-6(8) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #65 6-3 3-6 7-6(8) 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #26 Match data May 28, 2004* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jonas Bjorkman #64 3-6 7-5 6-4 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #28 Match data Jan 18, 2002* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Jonas Bjorkman #10 7-6(5) 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #17 Match data Nov 2, 1997* SF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Thomas Enqvist #8 6-3 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #25 Match data Aug 2, 1997* R16 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jonas Bjorkman #27 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data Apr 22, 1995* QF Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,037 395 344 53.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,726 0 0 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11
24 1996 23–25 47.9% #69 1,706 0 0 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,007 0 3 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,746 0 4 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,777 0 4 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,735 0 4 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,833 0 5 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19
32 2004 19–25 43.2% #70 1,680 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,743 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,657 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2008 7–13 35.0% #172 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Thomas Enqvist
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0%
19 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4%
22 1994 17 14 31 54.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
23 1995 23 14 37 62.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2%
24 1996 13 16 29 44.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1997 45 13 58 77.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 1998 22 15 37 59.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
27 1999 18 16 34 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2000 19 18 37 51.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2001 15 16 31 48.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 237 203 440 53.9% 33 56 89 37.1% 79 44 123 64.2% 46 41 87 52.9% — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 657/739 of Jonas Bjorkman's and 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Thomas Enqvist
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4%
19 1991 1/1 0.0 1.0 45.3% 54.2% 37.9% 58.3% 100.0% 45.3% 26.8% 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5%
20 1992 1/1 1.0 1.0 40.5% 64.7% 36.0% 33.3% 0.0% 47.6% 26.7% 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1%
21 1993 12/14 3.3 5.7 53.3% 70.4% 44.2% 53.0% 46.1% 58.0% 41.6% 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5%
22 1994 48/57 4.0 5.1 54.7% 72.4% 45.8% 57.0% 39.3% 60.2% 41.3% 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3%
23 1995 53/61 3.9 3.7 53.5% 70.4% 48.2% 50.9% 40.9% 60.2% 41.2% 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5%
24 1996 45/48 3.8 3.9 57.8% 69.7% 48.4% 55.4% 37.1% 60.6% 40.2% 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0%
25 1997 71/91 4.4 3.2 54.3% 73.1% 52.2% 61.0% 45.1% 63.6% 43.1% 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4%
26 1998 50/58 3.9 3.3 58.0% 68.9% 49.5% 57.2% 46.1% 60.7% 41.5% 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1%
27 1999 40/45 3.1 3.2 57.7% 67.0% 51.0% 59.8% 41.9% 60.4% 40.4% 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7%
28 2000 46/55 3.9 2.8 62.5% 70.9% 53.0% 57.5% 42.1% 64.3% 39.0% 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8%
29 2001 41/47 3.0 3.2 58.7% 67.8% 49.0% 60.0% 37.4% 60.2% 40.3% 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5%
30 2002 36/42 4.9 2.9 57.9% 71.7% 52.5% 60.1% 39.4% 63.5% 39.0% 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6%
31 2003 45/49 5.5 2.9 58.3% 74.8% 51.7% 69.0% 50.0% 65.1% 38.6% 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8%
32 2004 43/44 5.6 3.3 56.2% 70.6% 51.2% 56.5% 32.2% 62.3% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 39/39 4.4 3.7 54.6% 71.4% 51.7% 55.7% 42.0% 62.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 31/31 4.2 3.4 59.9% 70.2% 47.9% 47.9% 39.1% 61.1% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 36/36 4.4 3.1 61.3% 68.3% 48.4% 66.0% 42.1% 60.5% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 19/20 3.7 2.6 58.3% 70.5% 45.7% 49.7% 46.3% 60.6% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 657/739 4.2 3.4 57.2% 70.6% 49.8% 57.9% 41.6% 61.7% 39.8% — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Thomas Enqvist
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26
19 1991 1496 104.2 -1.46 -0.66 0.490 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.17 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87
20 1992 1489 100.9 -1.75 +1.16 0.509 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15
21 1993 1559 126.9 -2.47 +3.06 0.990 49.7% +42 — — 45.2% -0.39 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.04 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31
22 1994 1752 141.1 -1.19 +3.27 1.037 50.4% -19 -167 -55 51.7% +0.25 12–7 (63%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.47 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31
23 1995 1727 144.5 -1.62 +2.91 1.034 50.1% +48 -136 -62 54.8% +0.21 11–10 (52%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.57 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31
24 1996 1706 138.7 -0.83 +2.45 1.021 50.2% -1 -32 -43 50.7% +0.09 9–13 (41%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.41 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78
25 1997 2007 158.3 +1.45 +5.73 1.183 53.1% +37 -327 -297 67.1% +1.05 13–9 (59%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.40 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56
26 1998 1874 148.6 -0.77 +3.53 1.056 51.1% +16 -202 -75 57.2% +0.41 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.24 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24
27 1999 1747 143.3 -0.90 +2.45 1.021 50.3% +59 -134 +15 49.6% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.35 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65
28 2000 1777 137.7 +1.95 +1.81 1.092 51.6% -17 -188 +73 51.8% +0.35 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.25 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01
29 2001 1736 138.2 -1.27 +2.62 1.013 50.3% -6 -195 +85 51.8% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.20 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28
30 2002 1749 145.8 +1.10 +2.01 1.068 51.0% +17 -277 +105 50.0% +0.10 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.63 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37
31 2003 1834 142.2 +2.29 +1.49 1.106 51.9% -30 -284 +79 57.1% +0.58 6–3 (67%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.40 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73
32 2004 1681 133.1 -0.67 -0.20 0.932 48.8% +15 -142 +166 43.2% -0.35 9–6 (60%) 7–14 (33%) — -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1744 132.0 -0.19 +2.61 1.076 51.0% -2 — +95 48.9% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 1678 123.4 -1.15 -0.31 0.946 48.8% -99 — +317 44.7% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1658 132.4 -2.28 +1.93 0.983 50.2% -111 -113 +323 48.6% +0.03 7–7 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1645 125.3 -0.81 -2.46 0.858 47.1% -25 -106 +251 34.7% -0.92 4–2 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2037 147.3 -0.26 +2.40 1.039 50.6% +5 -178 +71 52.5% +0.20 113–114 (50%) 123–120 (51%) 97.3 -0.42 — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.