H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 3-2

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 3–2 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2004 Roland Garros second round 6-3 3-6 7-6(8) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Thomas Enqvist #65 6-3 3-6 7-6(8) 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #26 Match data
Jan 18, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #64 3-6 7-5 6-4 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #28 Match data
Nov 2, 1997* Paris Masters Masters 1000 SF Carpet Jonas Bjorkman #10 7-6(5) 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #17 Match data
Aug 2, 1997* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #8 6-3 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #25 Match data
Apr 22, 1995* Hong Kong ATP 250 QF Hard Jonas Bjorkman #27 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6 — — — — — — —