H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Harold Solomon H2H: 1-0
Jonathan Canter holds a 1–0 lead over Harold Solomon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1986 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jonathan Canter | 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Harold Solomon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 |