H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Christopher O'Connell H2H: 1-0
Jordan Thompson holds a 1–0 lead over Christopher O'Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jordan Thompson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jordan Thompson won the 2022 Melbourne third round 1-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2022* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jordan Thompson | 1-6 7-5 6-4 | Christopher O'Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Christopher O'Connell | #127 | #53 | 930 | 1,820 | 62 | 96 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Christopher O'Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #116 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |