H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Daniel Elahi Galan H2H: 0-2
Daniel Elahi Galan holds a 2–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Elahi Galan leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Elahi Galan won the 2022 US Open second round 6-3 2-6 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Colombia
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Daniel Elahi Galan | 6-3 2-6 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2019* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Daniel Elahi Galan | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniel Elahi Galan | #304 | #56 | 863 | 1,777 | 45 | 73 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Daniel Elahi Galan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #427 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #191 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |