H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jordan Thompson vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 0-2

Diego Schwartzman holds a 2–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2017 Shanghai Masters first round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jordan Thompson
Australia Age 32 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Schwartzman #26 6-4 7-6(4) Jordan Thompson #72 Match data Oct 10, 2017* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Diego Schwartzman #46 6-1 6-3 Jordan Thompson #91 Match data May 5, 2017* R16 Istanbul ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jordan Thompson #334 #26 1,745 1,944 150 173 46.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jordan Thompson Diego Schwartzman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2014 0–1 0.0% #276 1,486 0 0 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0
21 2015 0–1 0.0% #154 1,474 0 0 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0
22 2016 3–10 23.1% #79 1,493 0 0 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0
23 2017 10–16 38.5% #94 1,673 0 0 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1
24 2018 1–10 9.1% #72 1,549 0 0 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1
25 2019 26–22 54.2% #63 1,765 0 0 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2
26 2020 10–12 45.5% #51 1,758 0 0 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3
27 2021 21–21 50.0% #75 1,692 0 0 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3
28 2022 10–17 37.0% #84 1,687 0 0 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #55 1,761 0 0 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4
30 2024 36–24 60.0% #26 1,916 0 1 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4
31 2025 13–16 44.8% #108 1,795 0 1 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4
32 2026 1–1 50.0% #334 1,786 0 1 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jordan Thompson Diego Schwartzman
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
21 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2016 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2017 7 10 17 41.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2018 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2019 16 15 31 51.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2020 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2021 10 11 21 47.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — —
28 2022 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2023 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2024 29 16 45 64.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 2025 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
32 2026 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 99 109 208 47.6% 16 32 48 33.3% 35 32 67 52.2% — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 319/324 of Jordan Thompson's and 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jordan Thompson Diego Schwartzman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2014 1/1 13.0 7.0 60.3% 72.2% 42.3% 44.4% 30.0% 60.3% 37.7% 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9%
21 2015 1/1 4.0 10.0 55.4% 63.9% 50.0% 76.5% 25.0% 57.7% 35.1% 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9%
22 2016 12/13 6.1 2.9 57.2% 74.6% 51.4% 51.0% 36.2% 64.5% 33.3% 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2%
23 2017 26/26 6.4 2.8 60.5% 68.8% 45.7% 52.9% 36.0% 59.8% 36.6% 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5%
24 2018 11/11 5.2 3.6 67.4% 63.5% 40.0% 54.6% 33.9% 56.6% 34.9% 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0%
25 2019 48/48 6.2 1.9 66.8% 71.7% 51.4% 63.7% 44.3% 64.8% 36.1% 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4%
26 2020 22/22 5.2 2.0 63.3% 69.6% 49.4% 61.2% 31.2% 62.0% 34.0% 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8%
27 2021 42/42 7.4 2.0 58.3% 72.4% 50.2% 54.8% 35.1% 63.1% 34.8% 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4%
28 2022 27/27 7.0 1.8 64.3% 70.7% 46.3% 57.8% 40.2% 62.1% 32.9% 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6%
29 2023 41/41 8.3 1.2 59.8% 75.1% 57.5% 60.6% 34.9% 67.8% 35.5% 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4%
30 2024 58/60 6.7 1.2 59.9% 73.0% 54.3% 62.9% 40.0% 65.3% 36.6% 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9%
31 2025 28/29 8.0 1.9 59.8% 71.0% 53.9% 52.3% 29.3% 64.1% 31.1% 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6%
32 2026 2/3 11.0 1.0 58.0% 71.0% 61.0% 57.0% 44.5% 67.0% 36.0% 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5%
Career — 319/324 6.9 1.9 61.5% 71.7% 51.4% 58.6% 37.1% 63.8% 35.0% — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jordan Thompson Diego Schwartzman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1500 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1486 102.5 -2.21 -0.55 0.949 47.8% — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 — — -0.07 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04
21 2015 1474 107.0 +0.43 -1.25 0.830 47.3% — — — 0.0% -1.67 — 0–1 — +0.06 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40
22 2016 1493 120.8 -0.49 -1.64 0.940 48.6% -2 — +60 31.4% -0.97 0–4 (0%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.16 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.75
23 2017 1673 144.0 -1.84 +0.04 0.910 48.4% -28 -100 -109 41.7% -0.36 6–5 (55%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.72 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.35
24 2018 1549 111.8 -4.44 -1.25 0.804 45.8% +2 — +8 22.6% -1.58 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.27 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) — +0.94
25 2019 1766 146.6 -0.04 +0.74 1.024 50.7% -45 -141 -118 52.0% +0.33 11–9 (55%) 8–16 (33%) — +1.12 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.44
26 2020 1758 136.7 -0.96 -1.83 0.896 48.2% +7 -166 — 48.3% -0.23 4–4 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.01 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.19
27 2021 1692 125.0 +0.01 -1.47 0.943 49.0% -26 -129 +61 46.7% -0.38 10–4 (71%) 14–8 (64%) — +1.58 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.52
28 2022 1688 135.7 -1.27 -2.32 0.868 47.7% -9 -141 +44 41.1% -0.64 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.69 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.93
29 2023 1761 146.9 +2.72 +0.27 1.102 51.0% -30 -293 +91 51.5% +0.10 4–10 (29%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.13 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) — +2.52
30 2024 1916 153.5 +1.02 +1.46 1.052 50.8% +23 -420 -39 55.9% +0.07 12–6 (67%) 18–5 (78%) — -0.10 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.53
31 2025 1795 131.8 -0.92 -2.39 0.868 47.5% +40 -280 +67 46.8% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.98 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19
32 2026 1787 106.8 +1.25 -0.94 1.091 50.5% — — — 50.0% +0.38 — 1–1 — +0.12 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10
Career — 1945 146.1 -0.04 -0.43 0.967 49.3% -7 -216 +16 47.1% -0.23 57–56 (50%) 77–69 (53%) 107.3 +0.28 — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.