H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 0-2
Diego Schwartzman holds a 2–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2017 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2017* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Diego Schwartzman | 6-4 7-6(4) | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
| May 5, 2017* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Diego Schwartzman | 6-1 6-3 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Diego Schwartzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |