H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 1-0
Jordan Thompson holds a 1–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jordan Thompson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jordan Thompson won the 2023 Chengdu fourth round 6-1 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2023* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jordan Thompson | 6-1 7-6(1) | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |