H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Emil Ruusuvuori H2H: 0-3
Emil Ruusuvuori holds a 3–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emil Ruusuvuori leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emil Ruusuvuori won the 2022 Melbourne fourth round 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Finland
Age 27
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2022* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Emil Ruusuvuori | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2021* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Emil Ruusuvuori | 6-3 7-6(5) | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2020* | Nur-Sultan | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Emil Ruusuvuori | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Emil Ruusuvuori | #545 | #37 | 1,041 | 1,886 | 97 | 98 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Emil Ruusuvuori | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #95 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |