H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jordi Arrese vs Fernando Luna H2H: 0-3

Fernando Luna holds a 3–0 lead over Jordi Arrese in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Luna leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1989 Nice round of 16 7-6 1-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jordi Arrese
ESP Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Fernando Luna
ESP Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Luna #80 7-6 1-6 7-5 Jordi Arrese #40 Match data Apr 21, 1989* R16 Nice ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Luna #50 6-0 6-3 Jordi Arrese #102 Match data Sep 12, 1986* R16 Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Luna #45 6-2 6-4 Jordi Arrese #292 Match data Jul 18, 1984* R64 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jordi Arrese #775 #23 1,077 1,830 218 208 51.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Fernando Luna #723 #33 310 1,779 167 160 51.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jordi Arrese Fernando Luna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1983 0–1 0.0% #831 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 3–5 37.5% #214 1,519 0 0 1977 1–1 50.0% #322 1,511 0 0
20 1985 3–8 27.3% #154 1,498 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% #340 1,541 0 0
21 1986 13–11 54.2% #97 1,633 0 0 1979 5–9 35.7% #87 1,517 0 0
22 1987 9–13 40.9% #128 1,613 0 0 1980 18–13 58.1% #66 1,708 0 0
23 1988 18–12 60.0% #33 1,712 0 0 1981 17–15 53.1% #81 1,694 0 0
24 1989 20–18 52.6% #44 1,669 0 0 1982 23–18 56.1% #60 1,724 0 0
25 1990 26–21 55.3% #39 1,731 0 2 1983 19–13 59.4% #53 1,733 0 0
26 1991 36–22 62.1% #23 1,806 0 4 1984 12–14 46.2% #70 1,646 0 0
27 1992 31–22 58.5% #37 1,748 0 5 1985 10–14 41.7% #111 1,620 0 0
28 1993 20–22 47.6% #61 1,727 0 6 1986 19–14 57.6% #52 1,690 0 0
29 1994 23–23 50.0% #86 1,676 0 6 1987 4–6 40.0% #261 1,644 0 0
30 1995 16–20 44.4% #52 1,631 0 6 1988 18–12 60.0% #59 1,705 0 0
31 1996 0–10 0.0% #645 1,502 0 6 1989 11–16 40.7% #135 1,566 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1990 8–10 44.4% #110 1,588 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #356 1,535 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jordi Arrese Fernando Luna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 — — — — 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 — — — — 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 — — — — 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 — — — — 23 18 41 56.1% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 2 5 7 28.6% 24 14 38 63.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 — — — — 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 6 2 8 75.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 — — — — 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 29 17 46 63.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 — — — — 10 14 24 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 20 19 39 51.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 — — — — 23 23 46 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 — — — — 16 20 36 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 18 11 29 62.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1996 — — — — 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 — — — — 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 11 14 25 44.0% 207 183 390 53.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 10 10 0.0% — 0 1 1 0.0% 167 157 324 51.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jordi Arrese Fernando Luna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1983 1492 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1520 119.4 — — — — — +37 — 37.5% -0.50 — 0–1 — -0.09 1977 1512 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — — — +0.06
20 1985 1499 102.8 — — — — — +5 — 30.8% -1.58 — 1–1 — +0.71 1978 1541 122.3 — — — — — +41 — 60.0% +1.10 0–2 — — -0.24
21 1986 1634 132.9 — — — — — +20 — 56.6% +0.30 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 -0.25 1979 1517 119.6 — — — — — +31 — 43.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.7 +1.17
22 1987 1614 129.5 — — — — — +15 — 50.9% +0.37 1–8 (11%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 +0.48 1980 1708 148.6 — — — — — +22 — 54.3% +0.33 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 -1.05
23 1988 1713 139.0 — — — — — +25 — 58.7% +0.51 5–6 (45%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 -0.85 1981 1695 133.7 — — — — — +19 — 49.4% +0.10 10–6 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 98.7 +1.18
24 1989 1669 144.2 — — — — -173 +104 — 53.4% +0.51 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 99.1 -1.62 1982 1725 145.1 — — — — — +18 — 52.7% +0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.9 -0.88
25 1990 1732 134.6 — — — — -242 +97 — 54.4% +0.17 4–10 (29%) 9–2 (82%) 97.1 +0.23 1983 1733 134.9 — — — — — +26 — 57.7% +0.86 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +2.65
26 1991 1806 142.7 -1.05 +2.78 1.037 50.5% -242 +73 — 55.1% +0.26 16–6 (73%) 8–9 (47%) 106.7 +0.46 1984 1647 140.1 — — — — — +41 — 47.5% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -0.03
27 1992 1748 140.2 -2.07 +1.00 0.969 49.4% -208 +132 — 55.3% +0.48 13–3 (81%) 6–10 (38%) 103.1 +1.17 1985 1620 133.2 — — — — — +19 — 42.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.2 -1.21
28 1993 1728 134.0 -1.85 +0.58 0.917 48.4% -224 +86 — 47.0% -0.23 15–11 (58%) 10–6 (63%) 104.1 -0.50 1986 1691 141.4 — — — — — +38 — 57.5% +0.71 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 +0.24
29 1994 1676 132.4 -1.33 +2.29 1.016 50.2% — +53 — 48.6% -0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 +0.62 1987 1644 114.7 — — — — — +31 — 40.0% -1.10 — 1–0 — -0.15
30 1995 1631 135.0 -0.75 +2.02 0.998 49.8% — +24 — 46.7% -0.11 7–9 (44%) 7–5 (58%) 99.7 -2.02 1988 1706 136.6 — — — — — +48 — 58.7% +0.56 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.63
31 1996 1503 105.4 -2.29 -1.95 0.751 44.5% — +14 — 9.5% -2.52 0–2 0–2 — +0.35 1989 1566 117.8 — — — — — +22 — 46.0% -0.14 2–5 (29%) 6–4 (60%) 96.1 +0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1588 130.6 — — — — — +37 — 43.9% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1536 93.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — — — 12.5% -2.88 0–1 1–1 — +0.23
Career — 1831 141.9 -1.47 +1.65 0.981 49.6% -223 +65 — 50.8% +0.08 77–71 (52%) 59–64 (48%) 98.3 -0.33 — 1779 144.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — +29 — 50.7% +0.24 44–43 (51%) 32–47 (41%) 93.6 +0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.