H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Jordi Mas vs Johan Van Herck H2H: 0-1

Johan Van Herck holds a 1–0 lead over Jordi Mas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johan Van Herck leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Johan Van Herck won the 1998 Roland Garros round of 64 6-3 7-6(4) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jordi Mas
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Johan Van Herck
BEL Age 52 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Johan Van Herck 6-3 7-6(4) 7-5 Jordi Mas #280 Match data May 29, 1998* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jordi Mas #1,160 #199 228 1,500 1 3 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johan Van Herck — — — 1,662 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jordi Mas Johan Van Herck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #364 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1993 0–1 0.0% #448 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1998 1–1 50.0% #201 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jordi Mas Johan Van Herck
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 7 7 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — 12 25 37 32.4% 22 25 47 46.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 10 15 25 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jordi Mas Johan Van Herck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1493 102.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1492 110.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.20
20 1992 1488 99.5 +1.23 -1.80 0.822 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 1994 1502 120.0 — — — — +20 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 0–2 — -0.38
21 1993 1473 97.5 -1.27 -4.06 0.678 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13 1995 1506 105.8 — — — — +29 +8 — 33.3% -0.90 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.48
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1598 121.9 — — — — -12 -12 — 44.2% -0.64 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 98.4 +0.80
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1632 127.8 — — — — -26 -9 — 44.3% -0.41 3–5 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 99.7 -1.24
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1523 114.8 — — — — +24 +65 — 41.4% -0.67 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 97.5 +0.49
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1536 113.2 — — — — — +46 — 47.1% -0.29 1–2 (33%) — — +0.16
26 1998 1483 100.8 -0.54 -4.69 1.079 51.8% — — — 42.9% -0.71 — 1–1 — +0.37 2000 1554 103.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1500 99.0 -0.19 -3.52 0.848 46.2% — — — 27.3% -1.54 — 1–1 — +14.25 — 1662 125.2 — — — — -1 +17 — 41.6% -0.63 10–20 (33%) 20–22 (48%) 95.0 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.