H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jose Acasuso vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 2-0

Jose Acasuso holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jose Acasuso leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2008 Argentina Open second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jose Acasuso #51 6-3 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #157 Match data Feb 22, 2008* R16 Argentina Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jose Acasuso #58 6-2 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #167 Match data Feb 1, 2008* R16 Chile Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jose Acasuso Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jose Acasuso Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/359 of Jose Acasuso's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jose Acasuso Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2001 18/20 5.4 2.1 47.2% 71.2% 48.0% 59.4% 40.6% 58.6% 34.2% 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2002 36/38 3.8 3.3 54.9% 71.4% 51.6% 57.5% 46.7% 62.1% 37.5% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2003 29/30 4.8 3.1 56.4% 68.6% 50.8% 55.4% 40.1% 60.7% 34.0% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2004 34/34 4.6 2.7 53.8% 72.2% 50.2% 46.7% 37.0% 62.1% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 52/53 7.6 2.6 54.1% 75.1% 53.0% 61.8% 40.6% 64.9% 36.3% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2006 48/48 6.8 2.0 53.0% 74.9% 54.9% 60.2% 46.5% 65.5% 38.8% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2007 37/37 4.6 2.6 54.8% 71.9% 49.8% 51.2% 42.5% 62.3% 38.6% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2008 50/50 4.5 3.2 54.9% 72.1% 47.9% 57.8% 36.6% 61.0% 38.0% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2009 42/42 5.1 2.5 55.4% 72.8% 50.5% 61.1% 39.9% 62.8% 34.6% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2010 4/4 6.5 2.8 60.8% 73.5% 55.2% 52.3% 47.9% 65.9% 38.2% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2011 3/3 2.3 0.7 55.7% 70.0% 59.0% 75.9% 43.9% 64.7% 37.4% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 353/359 5.4 2.7 54.3% 72.6% 51.1% 57.3% 41.3% 62.7% 37.0% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jose Acasuso Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -0.39 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.97 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.5 -0.45 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +141 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) 103.8 -0.74 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 102.3 +0.52 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 +2.36 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 98.6 +0.97 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.5 +1.79 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 101.0 -0.56 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.