H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Ivan Navarro H2H: 2-0
Jose Acasuso holds a 2–0 lead over Ivan Navarro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jose Acasuso leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2008 Bucharest quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2008* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-4 6-4 | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2006* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-3 6-2 | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ivan Navarro | #1,929 | #67 | 1,108 | 1,627 | 35 | 65 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Acasuso | Ivan Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #138 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #128 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #124 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #74 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #193 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |