H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Jose Acasuso holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2004 Sopot third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2004* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 7-5 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jose Acasuso | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |