H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jozef Kovalik vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 0-1
Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Jozef Kovalik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2019 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2020 | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Jozef Kovalik | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2019 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Aljaz Bedene | 6-2 6-4 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Aljaz Bedene | 6-3 6-4 7-5 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jozef Kovalik | #591 | #80 | 701 | 1,758 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jozef Kovalik | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #139 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #131 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |